Background and aims: Investigation was carried out to estimate the variability, heritability, genetic advance for fiber yield based on yield attributing morpho-anatomical traits of tossa jute in field and laboratory. Materials & Methods: The experiments were carried out using 12 tossa jute genotypes followed by randomized complete block design in five jute research regions (Rangpur, Faridpur, Jessore, Manikganj districts and Bangladesh Jute Research Institute head office, Dhaka) of Bangladesh during 2019-20. Hypothesis: The tested genotypes were expected to perform better for fiber yield than control varieties. Results: The jute genotypes i.e. Acc. 1318, Acc. 1306, (JRO S1), O-412-9-4, O-0512-6-2 providing good results for plant height, base diameter, green weight and dry fiber yield in morphological study; and total trapezoidal area per transverse section, number of trapezoid per T. section, bark diameter, bark thickness in anatomical study depicting the more variability as well as possibility of tossa jute development. These morphological and anatomical traits showing significant association with one another, and coupled with high genetic and phenotypic variance-covariance components; high heritability; high & moderate genetic advance and genetic advance in percent of mean would be used for selection of jute genotypes regarding the jute crop improvement for fiber yield. Conclusions: The high variation for morphological and anatomical characters may be considered as effective method for screening of jute genotypes for higher fiber yield comparing with control varieties. The genotypes i.e. Acc. 1318, Acc. 1306, (JRO S1), O-412-9-4, O-0512-6-2 with good morphological and anatomical traits related to yield could be used as parents in breeding program as well as jute variety development.
Published in | American Journal of BioScience (Volume 8, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajbio.20200804.12 |
Page(s) | 99-112 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Genetic Advance, Gene Bank, Genotypic-Phenotypic Correlation, Heritability, Phloem Fiber, Jute Anatomy
[1] | Islam MM, MS Ali (2017). Agronomic Research Advances in Jute Crops of Bangladesh. AASCIT Journal of Biology. Vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 34-46. http://www.aascit.org/journal/archive?journalId=980&issueId=9800306 |
[2] | Kar CS, A Kundu, D Sarkar, MK Sinha and BS Mahapatra (2009). Genetic diversity in jute (Corchorus spp) and its utilization: a review. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, August 2009, 79 (8): 575-86. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235666679 |
[3] | Kundu, A, N Topdar, D Sarkar et al. (2013). Origins of white (Corchorus capsularis L.) and dark (C. olitorius L.) jute: a reevaluation based on nuclear and chloroplast microsatellites. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 22, 372–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-012-0165-7 |
[4] | Kundu BC (1951). “Origin of jute,” Indian Journal of Plant Breeding, vol. 11, pp. 95–99. https://www.indianjournals.com/Mobile/SearchResult.aspx?query=3 |
[5] | Palve SM and MK Sinha (2005). “Genetic variation and interrelationships among fiber yield attributes in secondary gene pool of Corchorus spp. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics. 37 (1): 55–64. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/FullTextPDF/2005/20053136195. pdf |
[6] | Samira R, Moosa MM, Alam MM, Keka SI, Khan H (2010). In silico analysis of jute SSR library and experimental verification of assembly. Plant Omics Journal, 2010, 3: 57–65. https://www.pomics.com /khan_3_2_2010_57_65.pdf |
[7] | Satya P, AK Mahapatra and RK Maiti (2011). Fiber anatomy structure: a good predictor for fiber yield and fiber quality in Corchorus capsularis L. Int. J. Bios. Stress Mangt., 2 (3): 263- 67. http://connection. ebscohost.com/c/articles/66463960/ |
[8] | Maity S, S Chowdhury, AK Datta (2012). Jute Biology, Diversity, Cultivation, Pest Control, Fiber Production and Genetics. In: Lichtfouse E. (eds) Organic Fertilisation, Soil Quality and Human Health. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4113-3_9 |
[9] | Roy A, A Bandyopadhyay, AK Mahapatra, SK Ghosh, NK Singh, KC Bansal, KR Koundal and T Mohapatra (2006). Evaluation of genetic diversity in jute (Corchorus species) using STMS, ISSR and RAPD markers. Plant Breeding Journal, V-125, Issue-3, P: 292-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2006.01208.x |
[10] | Basu A, Ghosh M, Meyer R, Powell W, Basak SL, Sen SK (2004). Analysis of genetic diversity in cultivated jute determined by means of SSR markers and AFLP profiling. Crop Sci., 44: 678–685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.6780 |
[11] | Islam MM and MM Rahman (2013). Advances in jute and allied fibers post-harvest processing technologies in Bangladesh: Adoption constraints, prospect and future thrust. Research Web Pub, 1 (2): 20-30. https://www.academia.edu/7905084/ |
[12] | Nwangburuka C and OA Denton (2012). Heritability, Character Association and Genetic Advance in Six Agronomic and Yield Related Characters in Leaf Corchorus olitorius L. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 7 (7): 367-375. DOI: 10.3923/ijar.2012.367.375 |
[13] | Ngomuo M, T Stoilova, T Feyissa and PA Ndakidemi (2017). Characterization of Morphological Diversity of Jute Mallow (Corchorus spp.). Hindawi: International Journal of Agronomy, Volume 2017, Article ID 6460498, 12 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6460498 |
[14] | Kumar V, PK Singh, AS Dudhane, DK De and P Satya (2014). Anatomical and morphological characteristics of nine jute genotypes. Journal of Crop and Weed, 10 (2): 334-339. http://www.cropandweed.com/vol10issue2/ pdf2005/54.pdf |
[15] | Karmkar KS, C Bhattacharya and A Bakshi (2007). A comparative study on simple correlation coefficient value in capsularis Jute at different population level. J. Crop Weed, 3: 30-32. DOI: http://www.cropandweed.com/archives/2007/vol3issue2/7.pdf |
[16] | Maiti RK and P Satya (2009). Fiber bundle anatomy determines the yield potentials, and fiber quality of bast fiber (Long Fiber): A hypothesis. Int. J. Agril. Env. Biotech. 2 (4): 41-46. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/FullTextPDF/2010/20103017083.pdf |
[17] | https://www.google.com.bd/maps/For geographical location of the experimental regions. |
[18] | Mukul MM, S Rahman, MM Islam, SN Begum & L Hassan (2015). Molecular characterization of rice genotypes for Zinc biosynthetic gene (s) using microsatellite simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 1 (2), 187-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/ajmbr.v1i2.25611 |
[19] | Gomez AK and AA Gomez (1983). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. Book: International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines. 2nd Edition. https://www.academia.edu/2456341/statistical_Procedures_for_Agricultural_Research?auto=download |
[20] | Verma PK (2008). Preservation of botanical specimens retaining the natural colour pigments. J. Histotechnol; 30; 173 -190. https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/53605/1/01_title.pdf |
[21] | Gärtner H and FH Schweingruber (2013). Microscopic Preparation Techniques for Plant Stem Analysis. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland. https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/wsl/islandora/object/wsl: 9994 |
[22] | Tolivia D and J Tolivia (1987). Fasga: A new polychromatic method for simultaneous and differential staining of plant tissues. Journal of Microscopy, Volume148, Issue1, October 1987, Pages 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1987.tb02859.x |
[23] | JSG-International Jute Study Group (2009). Low cost retting of jute/kenaf/mesta for quality up-gradation, JCI and BJRI, Dhaka, Bangladesh. https://nanopdf.com/ download/low-cost-retting-of-jute-kenaf-mesta-for-quality-up_pdf |
[24] | https://statistix.informer.com/10.0/. Statistix 10- Analytical software (2020). (Statistix 10.0.0.9), |
[25] | Addinsoft (2020). XLSTAT statistical and data analysis solution. New York, USA. https://www.xlstat.com. |
[26] | Johnson HW, HF Robinson and RW Comstock (1955). Estimates of genetic and environment variability in Soybean. Agronomy Journal, 47: 314–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x |
[27] | Cohen J (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. http://www.utstat.toronto.edu/~brunner/oldclass/378f16/readings/Cohen Power.pdf |
[28] | Burton GW (1952). Quantitative inheritance in grasses. 6th Intl. Grassland Cong. Proc. 1: 227-238. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ |
[29] | Burton, G. W. and Devane, E. H. (1953). Estimating heritability in tall fesscusce from replicated clone natural materials. Journal of Agronomy, 45: 171–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1953.00021962004500100005x |
[30] | Lush JL (1949). Heritability of quantitative characters in farm animals. Proc. Of Intercropping. Cong. Genetica Heridita (Suppl.): 1949; 356-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1949.tb03347.x |
[31] | Comstock RE and HF Robinson (1952). Genetic parameters, their estimation and significance. Proc. 6th Intercropping. Grassland Cong. 1: 284-291. |
[32] | Karim D, Siddique MNA, Sarkar U, Hasnat MZ & Sultana J (2014). Phenotypic and genotypic correlation co-efficient of quantitative characters and character association of aromatic rice. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 01 (01), 36-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18801/ jbar.010114.05 |
[33] | DeLacy IH, KE Basford, M Cooper, JK Buil and CG McLaren (1996). “Analysis of multi-environment trials - An historical perspective,” in Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement, M. Cooper and G. L. Hammer, Eds., pp. 39–124, CAB International, Wallingford, England. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:fa3288d |
[34] | Tiwari DN, SR Tripathi, MP Tripathi, N Khatri and BR Bastola (2019). Genetic Variability and Correlation Coefficients of Major Traits in Early Maturing Rice under Rainfed Lowland Environments of Nepal. Hindawi: Advances in Agriculture, Volume 2019, Article ID 5975901, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5975901 |
[35] | Zhang L, Ibrahim AK, Niyitanga S, Zhang L, Qi J (2019). Jute (Corchorus spp.) Breeding. In: Al-Khayri J., Jain S., Johnson D. (eds) Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Industrial and Food Crops. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23265-8_4 |
[36] | Khatun R, MM Islam, M Al Hussain, N Parvin and K Sultana (2009). Performance study of newly developed jute variety BJRI Deshi-7 (BJC-2142). Int. J. Sustain. Agril. Tech., 5 (4): 12-18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 313314160 |
[37] | Singh BD (2001). Plant Breeding: Principles and Methods, 6th ed., Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India. http://14.139.206.50:8000/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber =171744 |
[38] | BCSIR- Bangladesh Scientific and Industrial Research Council (2018). Central Report. http://bcsir.portal.gov.bd/ |
[39] | Aditya JP, P Bhartiya, A Bhartiya (2011). Genetic variability, heritability and character association for yield and component characters in soybean (G. max (L.) Merrill). Journal of Central European Agriculture, 12 (1), p: 27-34. DOI: /10.5513/JCEA01/12.1.877 |
[40] | Ghosh RK, Sreewongchai1 T, Nakasathien1 S and Phumichai1 C (2013). Phenotypic variation and the relationships among jute (Corchorus species) genotypes using morpho-agronomic traits and multivariate analysis. Australian J. Crop Sci., 7: 830-42. http://www.cropj.com/phumichai_7 _6_2013_830_842.pdf |
[41] | Mukul MM, SN Begum, MM Islam, MSR Khanom, MK Saha, S Ar-Raffi and L Hassan (2014). Phenotypic diversity analysis of iron rich rice landraces. Asian Australas. J. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2016, 1 (1), 15-22. https://www.ebupress.com/journal/ aajbb/2016/06/09/ |
[42] | Deshmukh SN, MS Basu and PS Reddy (1986). Genetic variability, character association and path analysis of quantitative traits in Virginia bunch varieties of ground nut. Indian Journal of Agriculture Science, 56: 816–821. http://agris.fao.org/agrissearch/search.do?recordID=IN19870039515 |
[43] | Yadeta B, D Belew, W Gebreselassie and F Marame (2011). Variability, heritability and genetic advance in hot pepper (C. annuum L.) genotypes in West Shoa Ethiopia. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 10 (4): 587–592. https://www.idosi.org/aejaes/jaes10(4)/16.pdf |
[44] | Sreelathakumary I and I Rajamory (2004). Variability, heritability and genetic advance in chili (Capsicum annuum L.). Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 42 (1-2): 35–37. http://jtropag.kau.in/ index.php/ojs2/article/view/112/112 |
[45] | Rosmaina, Syafrudin, Hasrol, F Yanti, Juliyanti and Zulfahmi (2016). Estimation of Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance Among Local Chili Pepper Genotypes Cultivated in Peat Lands. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, Agricultural Academy, 22 (3), 431–436. https://journal. agrojournal.org/page/en/ details.php?article_id=257 |
[46] | Burton GW, & DeVane EH (1953). Estimating Heritability in Tall Fescue (Festuca Arundinacea) from Replicated Clonal Material1. Agronomy Journal, 45 (10), 478. DOI: 10.2134/agronj1953.00021962004500100005x. |
[47] | Hamdi A, AA El-Ghareib, S. A. Shafey and M. A. M. Ibrahim (2013). Genetic variability, heritability, and expected genetic advance for earliness and seed yield from selection in lentil. Ministry of Agriculture, Giza, Egypt, 81 (1): 125-138. https://books.google.com.bd/books?id=VfT6hZHpXPkC&pg=PA204&lpg=PA204&dq |
[48] | Maiti RK (1979). A study of the microscopic structure of the fiber strands of common Indian bast fibers and its economic implications. Economic Botany, 33 (1), pp. 78-87. https://www.jstor.org/stable/ i389412 |
[49] | Sengupta G and P Palit (2004). Characterization of a Lignified Secondary Phloem Fibre-deficient Mutant of Jute (Corchorus capsularis L.). Annals of Botany, 93: 211-220. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mch029. |
[50] | Snegireva A, Chernova T, Ageeva M, Lev-Yadun S, Gorshkova T (2015). Intrusive growth of primary and secondary phloem fibers in hemp stem determines fiber-bundle formation and structure. AoB PLANTS, 7: plv061; DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plv061. |
[51] | Milla, AJ, AR Akanda, SK Biswas and MA Uddin (2018). Determination of Crop Co-efficient Values for Jute (Corchorus olitorius L.). The Agriculturists, 16 (2): 115-122. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3329/agric. v16i02.40349 |
[52] | Majumdar S (2002). Prediction of fiber qualities from anatomical studies in jute stem: Part-I prediction of fineness. Indian J. Fiber Textile Res. 27: 248-53. http://nopr.niscair. res.in/bitstream/123456789/22849/1/IJFTR% 2027(3)%20248-253.pdf |
[53] | Pervin N and GKMN Haque (2012). Variability in anatomical characters in relation to fiber content and quality in white jute (Corchorus capsularis L.). International Research Journal of Applied Life Sciences. V-1, Issue-4, Article-6. DOI: 10.1.1.448.1564 &rep=rep1&type=pdf |
[54] | Kumar V, A Prakash and AK Kashyap (2018). Combining ability and heterosis following line x tester analysis for fiber anatomical characters in cultivated jute. Plant Archives, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 2042-2046. http://www.plantarchives.org/18-02/2042-2046%20(4277).pdf |
[55] | Islam, MR, MM Islam, N Akter, RK Ghosh, Z Al Rafique and AKMS Hossain (2002). Genetic Variability and Performance of Tossa Jute (Corchorus olitorius L.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 5: 744-745. DOI:10.3923/pjbs.2002. 744.745. |
APA Style
Mukul Md. Mia, Nargis Akter, Md. Golam Mostofa, Sheikh Shorif Uddin Ahmed, Iffat Jahan Nur, et al. (2020). Analyses of Genetic Variability, Character Association, Heritability and Genetic Advance of Tossa Jute (Corchorus olitorius) Genotypes for Morphology & Stem Anatomy. American Journal of BioScience, 8(4), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20200804.12
ACS Style
Mukul Md. Mia; Nargis Akter; Md. Golam Mostofa; Sheikh Shorif Uddin Ahmed; Iffat Jahan Nur, et al. Analyses of Genetic Variability, Character Association, Heritability and Genetic Advance of Tossa Jute (Corchorus olitorius) Genotypes for Morphology & Stem Anatomy. Am. J. BioScience 2020, 8(4), 99-112. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20200804.12
AMA Style
Mukul Md. Mia, Nargis Akter, Md. Golam Mostofa, Sheikh Shorif Uddin Ahmed, Iffat Jahan Nur, et al. Analyses of Genetic Variability, Character Association, Heritability and Genetic Advance of Tossa Jute (Corchorus olitorius) Genotypes for Morphology & Stem Anatomy. Am J BioScience. 2020;8(4):99-112. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20200804.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajbio.20200804.12, author = {Mukul Md. Mia and Nargis Akter and Md. Golam Mostofa and Sheikh Shorif Uddin Ahmed and Iffat Jahan Nur and Md. Al-Mamun and Md. Harun-Or Rashid}, title = {Analyses of Genetic Variability, Character Association, Heritability and Genetic Advance of Tossa Jute (Corchorus olitorius) Genotypes for Morphology & Stem Anatomy}, journal = {American Journal of BioScience}, volume = {8}, number = {4}, pages = {99-112}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajbio.20200804.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20200804.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbio.20200804.12}, abstract = {Background and aims: Investigation was carried out to estimate the variability, heritability, genetic advance for fiber yield based on yield attributing morpho-anatomical traits of tossa jute in field and laboratory. Materials & Methods: The experiments were carried out using 12 tossa jute genotypes followed by randomized complete block design in five jute research regions (Rangpur, Faridpur, Jessore, Manikganj districts and Bangladesh Jute Research Institute head office, Dhaka) of Bangladesh during 2019-20. Hypothesis: The tested genotypes were expected to perform better for fiber yield than control varieties. Results: The jute genotypes i.e. Acc. 1318, Acc. 1306, (JRO S1), O-412-9-4, O-0512-6-2 providing good results for plant height, base diameter, green weight and dry fiber yield in morphological study; and total trapezoidal area per transverse section, number of trapezoid per T. section, bark diameter, bark thickness in anatomical study depicting the more variability as well as possibility of tossa jute development. These morphological and anatomical traits showing significant association with one another, and coupled with high genetic and phenotypic variance-covariance components; high heritability; high & moderate genetic advance and genetic advance in percent of mean would be used for selection of jute genotypes regarding the jute crop improvement for fiber yield. Conclusions: The high variation for morphological and anatomical characters may be considered as effective method for screening of jute genotypes for higher fiber yield comparing with control varieties. The genotypes i.e. Acc. 1318, Acc. 1306, (JRO S1), O-412-9-4, O-0512-6-2 with good morphological and anatomical traits related to yield could be used as parents in breeding program as well as jute variety development.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Analyses of Genetic Variability, Character Association, Heritability and Genetic Advance of Tossa Jute (Corchorus olitorius) Genotypes for Morphology & Stem Anatomy AU - Mukul Md. Mia AU - Nargis Akter AU - Md. Golam Mostofa AU - Sheikh Shorif Uddin Ahmed AU - Iffat Jahan Nur AU - Md. Al-Mamun AU - Md. Harun-Or Rashid Y1 - 2020/07/13 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20200804.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajbio.20200804.12 T2 - American Journal of BioScience JF - American Journal of BioScience JO - American Journal of BioScience SP - 99 EP - 112 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0167 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20200804.12 AB - Background and aims: Investigation was carried out to estimate the variability, heritability, genetic advance for fiber yield based on yield attributing morpho-anatomical traits of tossa jute in field and laboratory. Materials & Methods: The experiments were carried out using 12 tossa jute genotypes followed by randomized complete block design in five jute research regions (Rangpur, Faridpur, Jessore, Manikganj districts and Bangladesh Jute Research Institute head office, Dhaka) of Bangladesh during 2019-20. Hypothesis: The tested genotypes were expected to perform better for fiber yield than control varieties. Results: The jute genotypes i.e. Acc. 1318, Acc. 1306, (JRO S1), O-412-9-4, O-0512-6-2 providing good results for plant height, base diameter, green weight and dry fiber yield in morphological study; and total trapezoidal area per transverse section, number of trapezoid per T. section, bark diameter, bark thickness in anatomical study depicting the more variability as well as possibility of tossa jute development. These morphological and anatomical traits showing significant association with one another, and coupled with high genetic and phenotypic variance-covariance components; high heritability; high & moderate genetic advance and genetic advance in percent of mean would be used for selection of jute genotypes regarding the jute crop improvement for fiber yield. Conclusions: The high variation for morphological and anatomical characters may be considered as effective method for screening of jute genotypes for higher fiber yield comparing with control varieties. The genotypes i.e. Acc. 1318, Acc. 1306, (JRO S1), O-412-9-4, O-0512-6-2 with good morphological and anatomical traits related to yield could be used as parents in breeding program as well as jute variety development. VL - 8 IS - 4 ER -