Response of Chickpea (<i>Cicer aeritinum</i> L.) Genotype to Intra and Inter Row Spacing at Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia

Tatek Tamiru; Walelign Worku; Worku Mengesha; Getu Weya

doi:doi:10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15

| Peer-Reviewed

Response of Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) Genotype to Intra and Inter Row Spacing at Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia

Tatek Tamiru, Walelign Worku, Worku Mengesha, Getu Weya

Published in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (Volume 5, Issue 4)

Received: 21 September 2020 Accepted: 6 October 2020 Published: 19 November 2020

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Chickpea has a major role in the daily diet of the rural community and urban population as a good source of energy, protein, minerals, vitamins, fiber and its straw is used for animal feed, and it also improves soil fertility by fixing the atmospheric nitrogen. Optimum plant density and appropriate genotypes for a given agro ecology influences plant size, yield components and ultimately the seed yield. Hence, a field experiment was carried out to determine the effect of intra and inter-row spacing on growth, yield and yield component of chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) Genotypes under rain fed condition in Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia in 2016 cropping season. A split-split plot design with three replications was used with two chickpea genotypes: Genotypes Habru and Mastewal were arranged in main plot and intra-row spacing of 5, 10 and 15 cm in sub-plot and inter-row spacing’s of 30, 40 and 50 cm in sub-sub plot. Days to flowering and hundred seed weight were significantly different between the two genotypes. Intra-row spacing had significantly affected physiological maturity, nodule dry weight plant^-1, plant height, primary branch plant^-1, pods plant^-1, seeds pod^-1, above ground biomass and seed yield. Inter row spacing also significantly affected days to flowering, days to physiological maturity, nodule number plant^-1, nodule dry weight, plant height, primary branch, pod plant^-1, seed number pod^-1, above ground dry matter and seed yield. Mastewal genotype obtained the maximum (2.91 t ha^-1) grain yield at the combination of 15 cm intra row and 30 cm inter row spacing while Habru genotype obtained (2.57 t ha^-1) at the same intra and inter-row spacing. Finally it could be concluded that intra row spacing of 15 cm and inter row spacing of 30 cm were found to be the optimum for maximum grain yield of chickpea using genotype Mastewal and Habru at Halaba, Huletegna choroko.

Published in	Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (Volume 5, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15
Page(s)	148-158
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Chickpea, Intra Row, Inter Row, Spacing, Split Split Plot, Genotypes

References

[1]	Aghaalikhani M, Ghalavand A, Ala A. 2006. Effect of plant density on yield and yield components of two cultivars and a line of mungbean (Vigna radiate L.) Wilczek in Karaj region. Journal of Sciences and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Water and Soil Science 9 (4), 111-121.
[2]	Akhtar, M. S., Siddiqui, Z. A., 2008. Effects of Glomus fasciculatum and Rhizobium sp. on the growth and root-rot disease complex of chickpea. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 40, 37-43.
[3]	Ali, M., Nawab, G., Rasool and M. Saleem, M., 2008. Estimates of Variability and Correlations for Quantitative Traits in Cicer arietinum. Journal of Agriculture and Social Sciences, 4: 177–79.
[4]	Alihan Cokkizgin, 2012. Botanical characteristics of chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.) under different plant densities in organic farming. Scientific Research and Essays, 7 (4): 498-503.
[5]	Anbessa, Y., and Bejiga G. 2002. Evaluation of Ethiopian chickpea landraces for tolerance to drought. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 49 (6): 557-564.
[6]	Andrade FH., Calviño P., Cirilo A. and Barbieri P. 2002. Yield responses to narrow rows depend on increased radiation interception. Agronomy Jounal. 94: 975-980.
[7]	Ayaz, S.; Mckenzie, B. A. and Hill G. D. (1999). The effect of plant population on dry matter accumulation, yield and yield components of four grains legumes. Agronomy New Zealand 29: 9-15.
[8]	Ayaz, S. B., A. Mckenzie., B. A. Hill and D. L. Mcneil (2000). The effect of plant population on dry matter accumulation, yield and yield components of four grain legumes. New Zealand, Journal of Agronomy 29: 9-15.
[9]	Ball, R. A., L. C. Purcell and E. D. Vories. 2000. Short-season soybean yield compensation in response to population and water regime. Crop Science, 40: 1070-1078.
[10]	Caliskan S., Aslan M., Uremis I. and Caliskan ME. 2007. The effect of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and doublecropped soybean. Turky Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 31: 147-154.
[11]	Chandrasekaran, B., K. Annadurai and E. Somasundaram, 2010. A Textbook of Agronomy. Published by New Age International (P) Ltd. Publishers, New Delhi, India.
[12]	Cokkizgin, A., 2012. Botanical Characteristics of Chickpea Genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.) Under Different Plant Densities in Organic Farming. Scientific Research and Essays. Academic Journal, 7 (4): 498-503. Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/SRE.
[13]	CSA (Central Statistical Agency), 2012. Agricultural sample survey. Report on land Utilization, Statistical Bulletin 302. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Central Statistics Authority.
[14]	Duzgunes O, Kesici T, Gurbuz F (1987). Statistical Methods I. Ankara University, Agricultural Engineering Faculty Press: 861, pp. 229.
[15]	Fallah S. 2008. Effects of Planting Date and Density on Yield and its Components in Chickpea (Cicer arientinum L.) Genotypes under Dryland Conditions of Khorram-Abad. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 45, 123-135, http://jstnar.iut.ac.ir/browse.php? a_code=A-10-2-902.
[16]	Gan, Y. T., R. R. Miller, B. G. Mc Conkey, R. R. Zentner, P. H. Liu and C. L. Mc Donald, 2003. Optimum Plant Population Density for Chickpea and Dry Pea in a Semiarid Environment. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 83 (1): 1-9.
[17]	Gaur, PM, S. Tripathi, CLL. Gowda, GV. Ranga Rao, HC. Sharma, S. Pande and M. Sharma, 2010. Chickpea Seed Production Manual. ICRISAT, Andhra Pradesh, India. 28 pp.
[18]	Hayat F, Arif M, Kakar KM. 2003. Effects of seed rates on mungbean varieties under dry land conditions. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 5 (2), 160-161.
[19]	James, A. T., R. J. Lawn and B. C. Imnie, (1996). Raising Soybean Yield through Application of Crop Physiology to Agronomy and Breeding. Dept. of Botany and Tropical Agriculture. J. Cook Univ. Australia Qld 4811.
[20]	Khan, E. A., M. Aslam, H. K. Ahmad, M. Ayaz and A. Hussain. 2010. Effect of row spacing and seeding rates on growth yield and yield components of chickpea. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 26 (2): 201-211.
[21]	Khan, M., M. A. Malik, M. F. Saleem, M. A. Cheema and A. Ahmad. 2000. Effect of different seeding times and seed rates on the growth yield and quality of ricebean. Int. J. Agric. & Biol., 2 (1-2): 104-106.
[22]	Khan, M. B. and M. Asif. 2001. Growth and yield response of mash bean genotypes to various planting densities. J. Res., (Science), 12 (2): 167-170.
[23]	Khanna-Chopra, R. and S. K. Sinha. 1987. Chickpea: physiological aspects of growth and yield, p. 163-189. In: M. C. Saxena and K. B. Singh (eds.), The chickpea. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
[24]	Legesse Dadi, Senait Regassa, Asnake Fikre and Demissie Mitiku. 2005. Adoption of chickpea varieties in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Research Report 62. EARO (Ethiopian Agricultural research Organization), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[25]	Menale Kassie, Bekele Shiferaw, Solomon Asfaw, Tsedeke Abate, Geoffrey Muricho, Setotaw Ferede, Million Eshete, and Kebebew Assefa. 2009. Current Situation and Future outlooks of the Chickpea Sub sector in Ethiopia. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Nairobi, and Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Deber Zeit Agricultral Research Centre, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. pp 1-43.
[26]	Momoh, E. J. and Zhou W., 2001. Growth and yield responses to plant density and stage of transplanting in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 186: 253-259.
[27]	Rafiee M, Alinzhad A, Sakinzhad T. 2006. The effect of plant density on stem retransfer percent leaf chlorophyll rate, rate of transpiration on canopy and seed filling growth of chickpea cultivars in dry land. First Agro physiological farming plants congress.
[28]	Rasul, F., M. A. Cheema, A. Sattar, M. F. Saleem and M. A. Wahid, 2012. Evaluating the Performance of Three Mungbean Varieties Grown under Varying Inter-row Spacing. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 22 (4): 1030-1035.
[29]	Sarwar MY (1998). Effect of different fertilizer doses and row spacing on growth and yield of gram (Cicer arietinum L.). MSc. Thesis, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan, pp. 76.
[30]	SAS (2004). SAS/STAT 9.1. User’s guide: Statistics. SAS institute Inc., Carry, NC, USA, p. 5121.
[31]	Schneider, K. and L. Anderson, 2010. Yield Gap and Productivity Potential in Ethiopia Agriculture: Staple Grains and pulses. Evans school policy Analysis and Research (EPAR) of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Evans Schools of public Affairs, university of Washington. Brief No. 98.
[32]	Shamsi K, Kobraee S, Rasekhi B (2011). The effects of different planting densities on seed yield and quantitative traits of rainfed chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 6 (3): 655-659.
[33]	Shamsi, K. and S. Kobraee. 2009. Effect of plant density on the growth, yield and yield components of three soybean varieties under climatic conditions of Kermanshah, Iran. Animal and Plant Sciences Journal, 2 (2): 96 - 99.
[34]	Sharar MS, Ayub M, Nadeem MA, Noori SA. 2001. Effect of different row spacings and seeding densities on the growth and yield of gram (Cicer arietinum L.). Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science, 38:51-53.
[35]	Shiferaw M. 2013. Response of Kabuli Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) Varieties to Plant Spacing At Debre Zeit, Central Ethiopia M.Sc. Thesis.
[36]	Sileshi Sh. 2013. Response of Faba bean (vicia faba L.) To Application of Phosphorus and Inter and Intra-row spacing at Teticha, Southern Ethiopia M.Sc. Thesis, University of Hawassa, Hawassa College of Agriculture, Ethiopia. 24 pp.
[37]	Syed, M. A., M. R. Islam, M. S. Hossain, M. M. Alam and M. N. Amin, 2012. Genetic Divergence in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Bangladesh Journal of Agriculture Research, 37 (1): 129-136.
[38]	Tawaha ARM, Turk MA, Lee KD. 2005. Adaptation of chickpea to cultural practices in Mediterranean type environment. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 1 (2), 152-157.
[39]	Thangwana, N. M. and J. B. O. Ogola, 2012. Yield and Yield Components of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum): Response to Genotype and Planting Density in Summer and Winter Sowings. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 10 (2): 710-715.
[40]	Tonçer, Ö and S. Kizil. 2004. Effect of seed rate on agronomic and technologic characters of Nigella sativa L. Int. J. Agric. & Biol., 6 (3): 529-532.
[41]	Tripathi, S., V. Sridhar, A. K Jukanti, K. Suresh, BV Rao, CLL Gowda and P. M. Gaur, 2012. Genetic Variability and Inter-relationships of Phenological, Physicochemical and Cooking Quality Traits in Chickpea. ICRISAT, Patancheru, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
[42]	Valimohammadi, F., M. Tajbakhsh and A. Saeid, 2007. Comparison of Winter and Spring Sown Dates and Effect of Plant Density on Yield Components and Some Quality, Morphological Traits of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Environmental Conditions of Urmia, Iran. Journal of Agronomy, 6 (4): 571-575.
[43]	Yilmaz, N. 2003. The effects of seed rate on yield and yield components of soybean (Glycine max L. Merill). Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 6 (4): 373-376.
[44]	Yordanos Fekade. 2013. Effect of population density and weeding frequency on Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinium L.) at Meskan Woreda, Gurage Zone, Southern Ethiopia. MSc. Thesis University of Hawassa, Hawassa College of Agriculture, Ethiopia.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Tatek Tamiru, Walelign Worku, Worku Mengesha, Getu Weya. (2020). Response of Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) Genotype to Intra and Inter Row Spacing at Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 5(4), 148-158. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Tatek Tamiru; Walelign Worku; Worku Mengesha; Getu Weya. Response of Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) Genotype to Intra and Inter Row Spacing at Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia. Ecol. Evol. Biol. 2020, 5(4), 148-158. doi: 10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Tatek Tamiru, Walelign Worku, Worku Mengesha, Getu Weya. Response of Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) Genotype to Intra and Inter Row Spacing at Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia. Ecol Evol Biol. 2020;5(4):148-158. doi: 10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15,
  author = {Tatek Tamiru and Walelign Worku and Worku Mengesha and Getu Weya},
  title = {Response of Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) Genotype to Intra and Inter Row Spacing at Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia},
  journal = {Ecology and Evolutionary Biology},
  volume = {5},
  number = {4},
  pages = {148-158},
  doi = {10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.eeb.20200504.15},
  abstract = {Chickpea has a major role in the daily diet of the rural community and urban population as a good source of energy, protein, minerals, vitamins, fiber and its straw is used for animal feed, and it also improves soil fertility by fixing the atmospheric nitrogen. Optimum plant density and appropriate genotypes for a given agro ecology influences plant size, yield components and ultimately the seed yield. Hence, a field experiment was carried out to determine the effect of intra and inter-row spacing on growth, yield and yield component of chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) Genotypes under rain fed condition in Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia in 2016 cropping season. A split-split plot design with three replications was used with two chickpea genotypes: Genotypes Habru and Mastewal were arranged in main plot and intra-row spacing of 5, 10 and 15 cm in sub-plot and inter-row spacing’s of 30, 40 and 50 cm in sub-sub plot. Days to flowering and hundred seed weight were significantly different between the two genotypes. Intra-row spacing had significantly affected physiological maturity, nodule dry weight plant-1, plant height, primary branch plant-1, pods plant-1, seeds pod-1, above ground biomass and seed yield. Inter row spacing also significantly affected days to flowering, days to physiological maturity, nodule number plant-1, nodule dry weight, plant height, primary branch, pod plant-1, seed number pod-1, above ground dry matter and seed yield. Mastewal genotype obtained the maximum (2.91 t ha-1) grain yield at the combination of 15 cm intra row and 30 cm inter row spacing while Habru genotype obtained (2.57 t ha-1) at the same intra and inter-row spacing. Finally it could be concluded that intra row spacing of 15 cm and inter row spacing of 30 cm were found to be the optimum for maximum grain yield of chickpea using genotype Mastewal and Habru at Halaba, Huletegna choroko.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Response of Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) Genotype to Intra and Inter Row Spacing at Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia
AU  - Tatek Tamiru
AU  - Walelign Worku
AU  - Worku Mengesha
AU  - Getu Weya
Y1  - 2020/11/19
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15
T2  - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
JF  - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
JO  - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
SP  - 148
EP  - 158
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3762
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15
AB  - Chickpea has a major role in the daily diet of the rural community and urban population as a good source of energy, protein, minerals, vitamins, fiber and its straw is used for animal feed, and it also improves soil fertility by fixing the atmospheric nitrogen. Optimum plant density and appropriate genotypes for a given agro ecology influences plant size, yield components and ultimately the seed yield. Hence, a field experiment was carried out to determine the effect of intra and inter-row spacing on growth, yield and yield component of chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) Genotypes under rain fed condition in Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia in 2016 cropping season. A split-split plot design with three replications was used with two chickpea genotypes: Genotypes Habru and Mastewal were arranged in main plot and intra-row spacing of 5, 10 and 15 cm in sub-plot and inter-row spacing’s of 30, 40 and 50 cm in sub-sub plot. Days to flowering and hundred seed weight were significantly different between the two genotypes. Intra-row spacing had significantly affected physiological maturity, nodule dry weight plant-1, plant height, primary branch plant-1, pods plant-1, seeds pod-1, above ground biomass and seed yield. Inter row spacing also significantly affected days to flowering, days to physiological maturity, nodule number plant-1, nodule dry weight, plant height, primary branch, pod plant-1, seed number pod-1, above ground dry matter and seed yield. Mastewal genotype obtained the maximum (2.91 t ha-1) grain yield at the combination of 15 cm intra row and 30 cm inter row spacing while Habru genotype obtained (2.57 t ha-1) at the same intra and inter-row spacing. Finally it could be concluded that intra row spacing of 15 cm and inter row spacing of 30 cm were found to be the optimum for maximum grain yield of chickpea using genotype Mastewal and Habru at Halaba, Huletegna choroko.
VL  - 5
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Tatek Tamiru

Department of Plant Science, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia
Walelign Worku

School of Plant and Horticultural Science, Hawassa University College of Agriculture, Hawassa, Ethiopia
Worku Mengesha

Department of Plant Science, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia
Getu Weya

Department of Food Process Engineering, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Tatek Tamiru, Walelign Worku, Worku Mengesha, Getu Weya. (2020). Response of Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) Genotype to Intra and Inter Row Spacing at Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 5(4), 148-158. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Tatek Tamiru; Walelign Worku; Worku Mengesha; Getu Weya. Response of Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) Genotype to Intra and Inter Row Spacing at Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia. Ecol. Evol. Biol. 2020, 5(4), 148-158. doi: 10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Tatek Tamiru, Walelign Worku, Worku Mengesha, Getu Weya. Response of Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) Genotype to Intra and Inter Row Spacing at Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia. Ecol Evol Biol. 2020;5(4):148-158. doi: 10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15,
  author = {Tatek Tamiru and Walelign Worku and Worku Mengesha and Getu Weya},
  title = {Response of Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) Genotype to Intra and Inter Row Spacing at Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia},
  journal = {Ecology and Evolutionary Biology},
  volume = {5},
  number = {4},
  pages = {148-158},
  doi = {10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.eeb.20200504.15},
  abstract = {Chickpea has a major role in the daily diet of the rural community and urban population as a good source of energy, protein, minerals, vitamins, fiber and its straw is used for animal feed, and it also improves soil fertility by fixing the atmospheric nitrogen. Optimum plant density and appropriate genotypes for a given agro ecology influences plant size, yield components and ultimately the seed yield. Hence, a field experiment was carried out to determine the effect of intra and inter-row spacing on growth, yield and yield component of chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) Genotypes under rain fed condition in Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia in 2016 cropping season. A split-split plot design with three replications was used with two chickpea genotypes: Genotypes Habru and Mastewal were arranged in main plot and intra-row spacing of 5, 10 and 15 cm in sub-plot and inter-row spacing’s of 30, 40 and 50 cm in sub-sub plot. Days to flowering and hundred seed weight were significantly different between the two genotypes. Intra-row spacing had significantly affected physiological maturity, nodule dry weight plant-1, plant height, primary branch plant-1, pods plant-1, seeds pod-1, above ground biomass and seed yield. Inter row spacing also significantly affected days to flowering, days to physiological maturity, nodule number plant-1, nodule dry weight, plant height, primary branch, pod plant-1, seed number pod-1, above ground dry matter and seed yield. Mastewal genotype obtained the maximum (2.91 t ha-1) grain yield at the combination of 15 cm intra row and 30 cm inter row spacing while Habru genotype obtained (2.57 t ha-1) at the same intra and inter-row spacing. Finally it could be concluded that intra row spacing of 15 cm and inter row spacing of 30 cm were found to be the optimum for maximum grain yield of chickpea using genotype Mastewal and Habru at Halaba, Huletegna choroko.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Response of Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) Genotype to Intra and Inter Row Spacing at Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia
AU  - Tatek Tamiru
AU  - Walelign Worku
AU  - Worku Mengesha
AU  - Getu Weya
Y1  - 2020/11/19
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15
T2  - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
JF  - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
JO  - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
SP  - 148
EP  - 158
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3762
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.15
AB  - Chickpea has a major role in the daily diet of the rural community and urban population as a good source of energy, protein, minerals, vitamins, fiber and its straw is used for animal feed, and it also improves soil fertility by fixing the atmospheric nitrogen. Optimum plant density and appropriate genotypes for a given agro ecology influences plant size, yield components and ultimately the seed yield. Hence, a field experiment was carried out to determine the effect of intra and inter-row spacing on growth, yield and yield component of chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) Genotypes under rain fed condition in Huletegna Choroko, Southern Ethiopia in 2016 cropping season. A split-split plot design with three replications was used with two chickpea genotypes: Genotypes Habru and Mastewal were arranged in main plot and intra-row spacing of 5, 10 and 15 cm in sub-plot and inter-row spacing’s of 30, 40 and 50 cm in sub-sub plot. Days to flowering and hundred seed weight were significantly different between the two genotypes. Intra-row spacing had significantly affected physiological maturity, nodule dry weight plant-1, plant height, primary branch plant-1, pods plant-1, seeds pod-1, above ground biomass and seed yield. Inter row spacing also significantly affected days to flowering, days to physiological maturity, nodule number plant-1, nodule dry weight, plant height, primary branch, pod plant-1, seed number pod-1, above ground dry matter and seed yield. Mastewal genotype obtained the maximum (2.91 t ha-1) grain yield at the combination of 15 cm intra row and 30 cm inter row spacing while Habru genotype obtained (2.57 t ha-1) at the same intra and inter-row spacing. Finally it could be concluded that intra row spacing of 15 cm and inter row spacing of 30 cm were found to be the optimum for maximum grain yield of chickpea using genotype Mastewal and Habru at Halaba, Huletegna choroko.
VL  - 5
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download