As an American playwright who established his fame in 1960s, Albee finds his name and plays widely listed among critics’ hails and attacks. Liked or disliked, praised or condemned, original or posturing, he has played an undoubtedly essential role in the development of American play. This paper attempts to study Edward Albee’s style of Theatre of the Absurd with special focus on his play The Zoo Story (1959). It first explores the distinguishing characteristics that mark the playwright Edward Albee out from other writers, that is, the description of violence in his plays, his standing on the borderline between absurdism and realism, and the attack upon the optimism of the American Dream. Then by seeking recourse to literary theories like the Theatre of the Absurd, and the Theatre of Cruelty, and philosophical terms such as Existentialism, the latter part of the paper deals with the specific discussion of Albee’s play The Zoo Story, commenting on its devaluation of language, the existential choice and violence in action, and simulation in characterization. The paper intends to draw the conclusion that absurdism is permeated in the play, which indicates that Albee enriches the philosophy and practice of the Absurd theatre and continues its tradition through transplanting it in the soil of American theatre.
Published in | English Language, Literature & Culture (Volume 7, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ellc.20220704.12 |
Page(s) | 98-103 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Edward Albee, Theatre of the Absurd, The Zoo Story, Absurdism
[1] | Cohen, Robert. (1994). Theatre. 3rd ed. Palo Alto: Mayfield Publishing Company, 229. |
[2] | Bennett, Michael Y. (2015). The Cambridge Introduction to Theatre and Literature of the Absurd. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 39. |
[3] | MacNicholas, John (1981). “Edward Albee.” Twentieth Century American Dramatists Part I: A-J. A Bruccoli Clark Book: Detroit, pp. 3-22, 4, 5. |
[4] | Bottoms, Stephen. Ed. (2005). The Cambridge Companion to Edward Albee (Cambridge Companions to Literature). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 16. |
[5] | Gussow, Mel (1999). Edward Albee: A Singular Journey: A Biography. Simon & Schuster: New York, 17. |
[6] | Esslin, Martin (1961). The Theatre of the Absurd. Anchor Books: New York, 225, 80. |
[7] | McCarthy, Gerry (1978). Edward Albee. Macmillan Publishers Ltd: London, 8, 47. |
[8] | Cohen, Ruby (1974). “Edward Albee”. American Writers: A Collection of Literary Biographies. Unger Leonard ed. Charles Scribner’s Sons: New York, pp. 71-95, 71. |
[9] | Way, Brain (1986). “Albee and the Absurd: The American Dream and the Zoo Story”. Critical Essays on Edward Albee. Philip C. Kolin & J. Madison Davis, ed. G. K. Hall & Co.: Boston, pp. 65-73, 73. |
[10] | Albee, Edward (1962). “The Zoo Story”. Famous American Plays of the 1950s. Ed. Lee Strasberg. Dell Publishing Co.: New York, pp. 385-415, 390, 389, 392, 400, 404, 412, 399. |
[11] | Roudané, Matthew (1987). Understanding Edward Albee. Matthew J. Bruccoli ed. University of South Carolina Press: Columbia, 199, 8, 30, 42, 43, 14, 27. |
[12] | Crowell, Steven. Ed. (2012). The Cambridge Companion to Existentialism. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 292. |
[13] | Camus, Albert. (1996). “The Myth of Sisyphus.” The Experience of Philosophy. Belmont & London: Wadsworth Publishing Company, pp. 519-526, 523. |
[14] | Marcia, David. (2019). “Art Is a Hammer: Aura, Textual Awareness, and Comedy in Albee”. Edward Albee as Theatrical and Dramatic Innovator. David A. Crespy & Lincon Konkle. eds. Leiden & Boston: Brill Rodopi, pp. 128-146, 130. |
[15] | Bigsby, C. W. E. (1986). “Confronting Reality.” Critical Essays on Edward Albee. Philip C. Kolin & J. Madison Davis. ed. Boston: G. K. Hall & Co, pp. 80-87, 81. |
APA Style
Liang Jianhua, Zhuang Qing. (2022). A Probe into Absurdism in Edward Albee’s Play The Zoo Story. English Language, Literature & Culture, 7(4), 98-103. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ellc.20220704.12
ACS Style
Liang Jianhua; Zhuang Qing. A Probe into Absurdism in Edward Albee’s Play The Zoo Story. Engl. Lang. Lit. Cult. 2022, 7(4), 98-103. doi: 10.11648/j.ellc.20220704.12
@article{10.11648/j.ellc.20220704.12, author = {Liang Jianhua and Zhuang Qing}, title = {A Probe into Absurdism in Edward Albee’s Play The Zoo Story}, journal = {English Language, Literature & Culture}, volume = {7}, number = {4}, pages = {98-103}, doi = {10.11648/j.ellc.20220704.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ellc.20220704.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ellc.20220704.12}, abstract = {As an American playwright who established his fame in 1960s, Albee finds his name and plays widely listed among critics’ hails and attacks. Liked or disliked, praised or condemned, original or posturing, he has played an undoubtedly essential role in the development of American play. This paper attempts to study Edward Albee’s style of Theatre of the Absurd with special focus on his play The Zoo Story (1959). It first explores the distinguishing characteristics that mark the playwright Edward Albee out from other writers, that is, the description of violence in his plays, his standing on the borderline between absurdism and realism, and the attack upon the optimism of the American Dream. Then by seeking recourse to literary theories like the Theatre of the Absurd, and the Theatre of Cruelty, and philosophical terms such as Existentialism, the latter part of the paper deals with the specific discussion of Albee’s play The Zoo Story, commenting on its devaluation of language, the existential choice and violence in action, and simulation in characterization. The paper intends to draw the conclusion that absurdism is permeated in the play, which indicates that Albee enriches the philosophy and practice of the Absurd theatre and continues its tradition through transplanting it in the soil of American theatre.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A Probe into Absurdism in Edward Albee’s Play The Zoo Story AU - Liang Jianhua AU - Zhuang Qing Y1 - 2022/12/08 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ellc.20220704.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ellc.20220704.12 T2 - English Language, Literature & Culture JF - English Language, Literature & Culture JO - English Language, Literature & Culture SP - 98 EP - 103 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-2413 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ellc.20220704.12 AB - As an American playwright who established his fame in 1960s, Albee finds his name and plays widely listed among critics’ hails and attacks. Liked or disliked, praised or condemned, original or posturing, he has played an undoubtedly essential role in the development of American play. This paper attempts to study Edward Albee’s style of Theatre of the Absurd with special focus on his play The Zoo Story (1959). It first explores the distinguishing characteristics that mark the playwright Edward Albee out from other writers, that is, the description of violence in his plays, his standing on the borderline between absurdism and realism, and the attack upon the optimism of the American Dream. Then by seeking recourse to literary theories like the Theatre of the Absurd, and the Theatre of Cruelty, and philosophical terms such as Existentialism, the latter part of the paper deals with the specific discussion of Albee’s play The Zoo Story, commenting on its devaluation of language, the existential choice and violence in action, and simulation in characterization. The paper intends to draw the conclusion that absurdism is permeated in the play, which indicates that Albee enriches the philosophy and practice of the Absurd theatre and continues its tradition through transplanting it in the soil of American theatre. VL - 7 IS - 4 ER -