Background: Fractures of the scaphoid are the second most common fractures of the upper limb after distal radius fractures. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is needed, because delayed initiation of therapy increases the risk of complications such as non-union and avascular necrosis. Objectives: To compare between the diagnostic accuracies of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in detecting scaphoid fractures and its complications. Methods: This study was carried out on 30 patients presented to private Hand clinic from October 2018 to December 2019, with clinical symptoms of tenderness in the anatomic snuffbox after wrist trauma and suspected to have scaphoid fracture in the plane X-ray. They were invited to enroll in a comparison of CT and MRI with regard to their diagnostic utility. Results: The mean age for study participants was 31.8 years (SD = 12.6 years). Nineteen patients (66.7%) had horizontal fractures, 10 had oblique structures (33.3). The MDCT showed that 29 patients had cortical fractures, MRI showed that 27 had cortical fractures, 2 patients had mixed fractures and one patient had a trabecular fracture. Conclusion: Multidetector CT had the superiority over MRI in detection of cortical involvement in scaphoid fractures but MDCT was inferior to MRI in detection of trabecular scaphoid fractures. MRI was superior to MDCT in early detection of stage I Scaphoid non-union advanced collapse. MRI was superior to CT in early detection of avascular necrosis of proximal segment of scaphoid bone.
| Published in | International Journal of High Energy Physics (Volume 8, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijhep.20210802.11 |
| Page(s) | 19-25 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Avascular Necrosis, Computed Tomography, Fracture, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Scaphoid
| [1] | Beasley RW. Beasley's Surgery of the Hand. New York: Thieme. ISBN. 2003; 978-1-282-95002-3. |
| [2] | Eathorne SW. The wrist: Clinical anatomy and physical examination—An update. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice. 2005; 32 (1): 17-33. |
| [3] | Schmitt R, Rosenthal H. Imaging of Scaphoid Fractures According to the New S3 Guidelines. Rofo. 2016; 188 (5): 459-69. |
| [4] | Dias JJ. Definition of union after acute fracture and surgery for fracture nonunion of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg Br. 2001; 26 (4): 321–325. |
| [5] | Dias JJ, Taylor M, Thompson J, Brenkel IJ, Gregg PJ. Radiographic signs of union of scaphoid fractures. An analysis of inter-observer agreement and reproducibility. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988; 70 (2): 299–301. |
| [6] | Singh HP, Forward D, Davis TR, Dawson JS, Oni JA, Downing ND. Partial union of acute scaphoid fractures. J Hand Surg Br. 2005; 30 (5): 440–445. |
| [7] | Karl JW, Swart E, Strauch RJ. Diagnosis of occult scaphoid fractures: a cost-effectiveness analysis. JBJS. 2015; 97 (22): 1860-8. |
| [8] | Bervian MR, Ribak S, Livani B. Scaphoid fracture nonunion: correlation of radiographic imaging, proximal fragment histologic viability evaluation, and estimation of viability at surgery: diagnosis of scaphoid pseudarthrosis. Int Orthop. 2015; 39 (1): 67-72. |
| [9] | Querellou S, Arnaud L, Williams T, Breton S, Colin D, Le Roux PY, et al. Role of SPECT/CT compared with MRI in the diagnosis and management of patients with wrist trauma occult fractures. Clinical nuclear medicine. 2014; 39 (1): 8-13. |
| [10] | Larribe M, Gay A, Freire V, Bouvier C, Chagnaud C, Souteyrand P. Usefulness of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of the viability of acute scaphoid fracture. Skeletal radiology. 2014; 43 (12): 1697-703. |
| [11] | Murthy NS. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in scaphoid fractures. The Journal of hand surgery. 2013; 38 (10): 2047-54. |
| [12] | De Zwart AD, Beeres FJ, Rhemrev SJ, Bartlema K, Schipper IB. Comparison of MRI, CT and bone scintigraphy for suspected scaphoid fractures. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2016; 42 (6): 725-31. |
| [13] | Ilica AT, Ozyurek S, Kose O, Durusu M. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography for patients with suspected scaphoid fractures and negative radiographic examinations. Japanese journal of radiology. 2011; 29 (2): 98-103. |
| [14] | Memarsadeghi M, Breitenseher MJ, Schaefer-Prokop C, Weber M, Aldrian S, Gäbler C, et al. Occult scaphoid fractures: comparison of multidetector CT and MR imaging—initial experience. Radiology. 2006; 240 (1): 169-76. |
| [15] | Wijetunga AR, Tsang VH, Giuffre B. The utility of cross-sectional imaging in the management of suspected scaphoid fractures. Journal of medical radiation sciences. 2019; 66 (1): 30-7. |
| [16] | Bäcker HC, Wu CH, Strauch RJ. Systematic review of diagnosis of clinically suspected scaphoid fractures. Journal of wrist surgery. 2020; 9 (01): 081-9. |
| [17] | Clementson M, Björkman A, Thomsen NO. Acute scaphoid fractures: guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. EFORT open reviews. 2020; 5 (2): 96-103. |
| [18] | Smith M, Bain GI, Turner PC, Watts AC. Review of imaging of scaphoid fractures. ANZ journal of surgery. 2010; 80 (1-2): 82-90. |
| [19] | Slade III JF, Dodds SD. Minimally invasive management of scaphoid nonunions. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2006; 445: 108-19. |
| [20] | Bhat AK, Acharya AM, Sourab SS. What Exactly is Avascular Necrosis in Nonunion Scaphoid?. Journal of Karnataka Orthopaedic Association. 2021; 9 (1): 02-7. |
| [21] | Xie C, Ather S, Mansour R, Gleeson F, Chowdhury R. Dual-energy CT in the diagnosis of occult acute scaphoid injury: a direct comparison with MRI. European radiology. 2021; 31 (6): 3610-5. |
| [22] | Cheema HS, Cheema AN. Radiographic evaluation of vascularity in scaphoid nonunions: A review. World Journal of Orthopedics. 2020; 11 (11): 475. |
| [23] | Mallee WH, Wang J, Poolman RW, Kloen P, Maas M, de Vet HC, et al. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015; 6: 11-15. |
APA Style
Basma Abdelmonem Desouky, Radwa Hamed Wahdan, Tarek Fawzy Abd Ella. (2022). Comparative Study Between Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Scaphoid Fracture Diagnosis. International Journal of High Energy Physics, 8(2), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20210802.11
ACS Style
Basma Abdelmonem Desouky; Radwa Hamed Wahdan; Tarek Fawzy Abd Ella. Comparative Study Between Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Scaphoid Fracture Diagnosis. Int. J. High Energy Phys. 2022, 8(2), 19-25. doi: 10.11648/j.ijhep.20210802.11
AMA Style
Basma Abdelmonem Desouky, Radwa Hamed Wahdan, Tarek Fawzy Abd Ella. Comparative Study Between Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Scaphoid Fracture Diagnosis. Int J High Energy Phys. 2022;8(2):19-25. doi: 10.11648/j.ijhep.20210802.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijhep.20210802.11,
author = {Basma Abdelmonem Desouky and Radwa Hamed Wahdan and Tarek Fawzy Abd Ella},
title = {Comparative Study Between Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Scaphoid Fracture Diagnosis},
journal = {International Journal of High Energy Physics},
volume = {8},
number = {2},
pages = {19-25},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijhep.20210802.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20210802.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijhep.20210802.11},
abstract = {Background: Fractures of the scaphoid are the second most common fractures of the upper limb after distal radius fractures. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is needed, because delayed initiation of therapy increases the risk of complications such as non-union and avascular necrosis. Objectives: To compare between the diagnostic accuracies of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in detecting scaphoid fractures and its complications. Methods: This study was carried out on 30 patients presented to private Hand clinic from October 2018 to December 2019, with clinical symptoms of tenderness in the anatomic snuffbox after wrist trauma and suspected to have scaphoid fracture in the plane X-ray. They were invited to enroll in a comparison of CT and MRI with regard to their diagnostic utility. Results: The mean age for study participants was 31.8 years (SD = 12.6 years). Nineteen patients (66.7%) had horizontal fractures, 10 had oblique structures (33.3). The MDCT showed that 29 patients had cortical fractures, MRI showed that 27 had cortical fractures, 2 patients had mixed fractures and one patient had a trabecular fracture. Conclusion: Multidetector CT had the superiority over MRI in detection of cortical involvement in scaphoid fractures but MDCT was inferior to MRI in detection of trabecular scaphoid fractures. MRI was superior to MDCT in early detection of stage I Scaphoid non-union advanced collapse. MRI was superior to CT in early detection of avascular necrosis of proximal segment of scaphoid bone.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparative Study Between Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Scaphoid Fracture Diagnosis AU - Basma Abdelmonem Desouky AU - Radwa Hamed Wahdan AU - Tarek Fawzy Abd Ella Y1 - 2022/01/08 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20210802.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijhep.20210802.11 T2 - International Journal of High Energy Physics JF - International Journal of High Energy Physics JO - International Journal of High Energy Physics SP - 19 EP - 25 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7448 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20210802.11 AB - Background: Fractures of the scaphoid are the second most common fractures of the upper limb after distal radius fractures. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is needed, because delayed initiation of therapy increases the risk of complications such as non-union and avascular necrosis. Objectives: To compare between the diagnostic accuracies of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in detecting scaphoid fractures and its complications. Methods: This study was carried out on 30 patients presented to private Hand clinic from October 2018 to December 2019, with clinical symptoms of tenderness in the anatomic snuffbox after wrist trauma and suspected to have scaphoid fracture in the plane X-ray. They were invited to enroll in a comparison of CT and MRI with regard to their diagnostic utility. Results: The mean age for study participants was 31.8 years (SD = 12.6 years). Nineteen patients (66.7%) had horizontal fractures, 10 had oblique structures (33.3). The MDCT showed that 29 patients had cortical fractures, MRI showed that 27 had cortical fractures, 2 patients had mixed fractures and one patient had a trabecular fracture. Conclusion: Multidetector CT had the superiority over MRI in detection of cortical involvement in scaphoid fractures but MDCT was inferior to MRI in detection of trabecular scaphoid fractures. MRI was superior to MDCT in early detection of stage I Scaphoid non-union advanced collapse. MRI was superior to CT in early detection of avascular necrosis of proximal segment of scaphoid bone. VL - 8 IS - 2 ER -
Email: