Antinutritional Factors in Plant Foods: Potential Health Benefits and Adverse Effects

Habtamu Fekadu Gemede; Negussie Ratta

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18

| Peer-Reviewed

Antinutritional Factors in Plant Foods: Potential Health Benefits and Adverse Effects

Habtamu Fekadu Gemede, Negussie Ratta

Published in International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Volume 3, Issue 4)

Received: 3 June 2014 Accepted: 4 July 2014 Published: 20 July 2014

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Anti-nutritional factors are compounds which reduce the nutrient utilization and/or food intake of plants or plant products used as human foods and they play a vital role in determining the use of plants for humans. This paper is aimed to review the updated scientific information regarding the potential health benefits and adverse effects associated with major antinutritional factors found in plant foods. Antinutrients in plant foods are responsible for deleterious effects related to the absorption of nutrients and micronutrients. However, some antinutrients may exert beneficial health effects at low concentrations. For example, phytic acid, lectins, tannins, saponins, amylase inhibitors and protease inhibitors have been shown to reduce the availability of nutrients and cause growth inhibition. However, when used at low levels, phytate, lectins, tannins, amylase inhibitors and saponins have also been shown to reduce the blood glucose and insulin responses to starchy foods and/or the plasma cholesterol and triglycerides. In addition, phytates, tannins, saponins, protease inhibitors, goetrogens and oxalates have been related to reduce cancer risks. This implies that anti-nutrients might not always harmful even though lack of nutritive value. Despite of this, the balance between beneficial and hazardous effects of plant bioactives and anti-nutrients rely on their concentration, chemical structure, time of exposure and interaction with other dietary components. Due to this, they can be considered as anti-nutritional factors with negative effects or non-nutritive compounds with positive effects on health.

Published in	International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Volume 3, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18
Page(s)	284-289
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Anti-nutritional factors, Potential Health Benefits, Adverse Health Effects, Plant Foods

References

[1]	Soetan K. and Oyewol O. (2009). The need for adequate processing to reduce the antinutritional factors in plants used as human foods and animal feeds: A review. African Journal of Food Science Vol. 3 (9), pp. 223-232.
[2]	Shanthakumari, S., Mohan, V. and Britto, J. (2008). Nutritional evaluation and elimination of toxic principles in wild yam (Dioscorea spp.). Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, (8), 319 - 225.
[3]	Ugwu, F. M. and Oranye, N. A. (2006). Effects of some processing methods on the toxic components ofAfrican breadfruit (Treculia qfricana). African Journal 0/Biotechnology 5,2329-2333.
[4]	Redden, R.J., Chen, W., & Sharma, B. (2005). Chickpea Breeding and Management. United Kingdom: CABI.
[5]	Muzquiz, M., Burbano, C., Cuadrado, C., and Martin, M. (2000). Analytical methods for determination of compounds with no nutritive value. In Handbook on Common Bean Related Laboratory Methods (p. 11-26). Spain:Galicia.
[6]	Felix, J.P., and Mello, D. (2000). Farm Animal Metabolism and Nutrition. United Kingdom: CABI.
[7]	Panhwar F. (2005). Anti-nutritional factors in oil seeds as aflatoxin in ground nut. Retrieved from www.ChemLin.com.
[8]	Kyriazakis I. and Whittenmore C.T. (2006). Whittenmore’s Science and Practice of Pig Production. Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell.
[9]	Aletor VA. (2005). Anti-nutritional factors as nature’s paradox in food and nutrition securities. Inaugural lecture series 15, delivered at The Federal University of Technology, Akure (FUTA).
[10]	Mueller I. (2001). Analysis of hydrolysable tannins. Anim Feed Sci Technol 91:3-20.
[11]	Harold (2004). On food and cooking: the science and lore of the kitchen. New York: Scribner. pp 714. ISBN 0-684-80001-2.
[12]	Mueller I. (2001). Analysis of hydrolysable tannins. Anim Feed Sci Technol 91:3-20.
[13]	Mushtaq M. (2000). Nutritional evaluation of soybean meal varying in urease and trypsin inhibitor activity. Thesis disertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
[14]	Muzquiz, M., Burbano, C., Cuadrado, C., and Martin, M. (2000). Analytical methods for determination of compounds with no nutritive value. In Handbook on Common Bean Related Laboratory Methods (p. 11-26). Spain:Galicia.
[15]	Nachbar M.S., Oppenheim J.D. and Thomas J.O. (2000). Lectins in the US diet: Isolation and characterization of a lectin from the tomato (Lycopersicon). J. Biol. Chem., 255:2056.
[16]	Noonan, S. C. and Savage, G. P. (1999). Oxalic acid and its effects on humans. Asia pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 8, 64–74.
[17]	Oladimeji M. O., Akindahunsi A. A., and Okafor, A. F. (2000). Investigation of the bioavailability of zinc and calcium from some tropical tubers. Nahrung, 44, 136–137 (Nr2, S).
[18]	Liebman M., Al-Wahsh I.A. (2011). Probiotics and other key determinants of dietary oxalate absorption. Adv. Nutr. 2, 254–260.
[19]	Liener I. E. (2005). Implications of antinutritional components in soybean foods. Food Sci. 34:31.
[20]	Liener I.E. and Kakade M.L. (1980). Protease inhibitors. In: Toxic constituents of plant food stuffs (Editor: I.E. Liener) Academic Press, New York, pp: 7-71.
[21]	Liener, I.E., (2003). Phytohemagglutinins: Their nutritional significance. J. Agric. Food Chem., 22: 17.
[22]	Loewus FA.(2002). Biosynthesis of phytate in food grains and seeds. In: Reddy NR, Sathe SK (Eds.). Food Phytates. CRC Press, Boca Raton Florida, pp 53–61.
[23]	Luo J., Litherland A.J., Sahlu T., Puchala R., Lachica M. and Goetsch, A.L. (2000). Effects of mimosine on fiber shedding, follicle activity and fiber regrowth in Spanish goats. J. Anim. Sci., 78: 1551-1555.
[24]	kernels. Grasas of Aceite (Espana), 44: 235-242.
[25]	Dost K., & Tokul O. (2006). Determination of phytic acid in wheat and wheat products by reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography, Analytica Chimica Acta, 558, 26-27.
[26]	FAO (1995). Sorghum and Millets in Human Nutrition. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Italy, Rome.
[27]	Felix, J.P., and Mello, D. (2000). Farm Animal Metabolism and Nutrition. United Kingdom: CABI.
[28]	Fereidoon S. (2014). Beneficial Health Effects and Drawbacks of Antinutrients and Phytochemicals in Foods. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:45–55.
[29]	Fereidoon S., (2012). Antinutrients and Phytochemicals in Food. Developed from a symposium sponsored by the Division of Agricultural and Food Chemistry at the 210th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Chicago, Illinoi. ACS symposium series, ISSN 0097-6156;2
[30]	Fernando R. Pinto MDP. and Pathmeswaran A. (2012). Goitrogenic Food and Prevalence of Goitre in Sri Lanka. J. Food Sci., 41: 1076-1081.
[31]	Finotti E., Bertone A and Vivanti V. (2006). Balance between nutrients and anti-nutrients in nine Italian potato cultivars. Food Chemistry 99, 698-701.
[32]	Friedman M, Henika P.R. and Mackey B.E. (2003). Effect of feeding solanidine, solasodine and tamatidine to non-pregnant and pregnant mice. Food and Chemical Toxicology 41, 61-71.
[33]	Giri A.P. and Kachole, M.S. (2004). Amylase inhibitors of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) seeds. Phytochemistry, 47: 197-202.
[34]	Golden M. (2009). Nutrient requirements of moderately malnourished populations of children. Food Nutr Bull.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Habtamu Fekadu Gemede, Negussie Ratta. (2014). Antinutritional Factors in Plant Foods: Potential Health Benefits and Adverse Effects. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 3(4), 284-289. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Habtamu Fekadu Gemede; Negussie Ratta. Antinutritional Factors in Plant Foods: Potential Health Benefits and Adverse Effects. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2014, 3(4), 284-289. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Habtamu Fekadu Gemede, Negussie Ratta. Antinutritional Factors in Plant Foods: Potential Health Benefits and Adverse Effects. Int J Nutr Food Sci. 2014;3(4):284-289. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18,
  author = {Habtamu Fekadu Gemede and Negussie Ratta},
  title = {Antinutritional Factors in Plant Foods: Potential Health Benefits and Adverse Effects},
  journal = {International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences},
  volume = {3},
  number = {4},
  pages = {284-289},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnfs.20140304.18},
  abstract = {Anti-nutritional factors are compounds which reduce the nutrient utilization and/or food intake of plants or plant products used as human foods and they play a vital role in determining the use of plants for humans. This paper is aimed to review the updated scientific information regarding the potential health benefits and adverse effects associated with major antinutritional factors found in plant foods. Antinutrients in plant foods are responsible for deleterious effects related to the absorption of nutrients and micronutrients. However, some antinutrients may exert beneficial health effects at low concentrations. For example, phytic acid, lectins, tannins, saponins, amylase inhibitors and protease inhibitors have been shown to reduce the availability of nutrients and cause growth inhibition. However, when used at low levels, phytate, lectins, tannins, amylase inhibitors and saponins have also been shown to reduce the blood glucose and insulin responses to starchy foods and/or the plasma cholesterol and triglycerides. In addition, phytates, tannins, saponins, protease inhibitors, goetrogens and oxalates have been related to reduce cancer risks. This implies that anti-nutrients might not always harmful even though lack of nutritive value. Despite of this, the balance between beneficial and hazardous effects of plant bioactives and anti-nutrients rely on their concentration, chemical structure, time of exposure and interaction with other dietary components. Due to this, they can be considered as anti-nutritional factors with negative effects or non-nutritive compounds with positive effects on health.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Antinutritional Factors in Plant Foods: Potential Health Benefits and Adverse Effects
AU  - Habtamu Fekadu Gemede
AU  - Negussie Ratta
Y1  - 2014/07/20
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18
T2  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
SP  - 284
EP  - 289
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2716
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18
AB  - Anti-nutritional factors are compounds which reduce the nutrient utilization and/or food intake of plants or plant products used as human foods and they play a vital role in determining the use of plants for humans. This paper is aimed to review the updated scientific information regarding the potential health benefits and adverse effects associated with major antinutritional factors found in plant foods. Antinutrients in plant foods are responsible for deleterious effects related to the absorption of nutrients and micronutrients. However, some antinutrients may exert beneficial health effects at low concentrations. For example, phytic acid, lectins, tannins, saponins, amylase inhibitors and protease inhibitors have been shown to reduce the availability of nutrients and cause growth inhibition. However, when used at low levels, phytate, lectins, tannins, amylase inhibitors and saponins have also been shown to reduce the blood glucose and insulin responses to starchy foods and/or the plasma cholesterol and triglycerides. In addition, phytates, tannins, saponins, protease inhibitors, goetrogens and oxalates have been related to reduce cancer risks. This implies that anti-nutrients might not always harmful even though lack of nutritive value. Despite of this, the balance between beneficial and hazardous effects of plant bioactives and anti-nutrients rely on their concentration, chemical structure, time of exposure and interaction with other dietary components. Due to this, they can be considered as anti-nutritional factors with negative effects or non-nutritive compounds with positive effects on health.
VL  - 3
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Habtamu Fekadu Gemede

Center for Food Science and Nutrition, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Negussie Ratta

Department of Chemistry, Addis Ababa University, P.O.Box: 1176, Addis Ababa Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Habtamu Fekadu Gemede, Negussie Ratta. (2014). Antinutritional Factors in Plant Foods: Potential Health Benefits and Adverse Effects. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 3(4), 284-289. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Habtamu Fekadu Gemede; Negussie Ratta. Antinutritional Factors in Plant Foods: Potential Health Benefits and Adverse Effects. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2014, 3(4), 284-289. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Habtamu Fekadu Gemede, Negussie Ratta. Antinutritional Factors in Plant Foods: Potential Health Benefits and Adverse Effects. Int J Nutr Food Sci. 2014;3(4):284-289. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18,
  author = {Habtamu Fekadu Gemede and Negussie Ratta},
  title = {Antinutritional Factors in Plant Foods: Potential Health Benefits and Adverse Effects},
  journal = {International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences},
  volume = {3},
  number = {4},
  pages = {284-289},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnfs.20140304.18},
  abstract = {Anti-nutritional factors are compounds which reduce the nutrient utilization and/or food intake of plants or plant products used as human foods and they play a vital role in determining the use of plants for humans. This paper is aimed to review the updated scientific information regarding the potential health benefits and adverse effects associated with major antinutritional factors found in plant foods. Antinutrients in plant foods are responsible for deleterious effects related to the absorption of nutrients and micronutrients. However, some antinutrients may exert beneficial health effects at low concentrations. For example, phytic acid, lectins, tannins, saponins, amylase inhibitors and protease inhibitors have been shown to reduce the availability of nutrients and cause growth inhibition. However, when used at low levels, phytate, lectins, tannins, amylase inhibitors and saponins have also been shown to reduce the blood glucose and insulin responses to starchy foods and/or the plasma cholesterol and triglycerides. In addition, phytates, tannins, saponins, protease inhibitors, goetrogens and oxalates have been related to reduce cancer risks. This implies that anti-nutrients might not always harmful even though lack of nutritive value. Despite of this, the balance between beneficial and hazardous effects of plant bioactives and anti-nutrients rely on their concentration, chemical structure, time of exposure and interaction with other dietary components. Due to this, they can be considered as anti-nutritional factors with negative effects or non-nutritive compounds with positive effects on health.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Antinutritional Factors in Plant Foods: Potential Health Benefits and Adverse Effects
AU  - Habtamu Fekadu Gemede
AU  - Negussie Ratta
Y1  - 2014/07/20
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18
T2  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
SP  - 284
EP  - 289
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2716
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18
AB  - Anti-nutritional factors are compounds which reduce the nutrient utilization and/or food intake of plants or plant products used as human foods and they play a vital role in determining the use of plants for humans. This paper is aimed to review the updated scientific information regarding the potential health benefits and adverse effects associated with major antinutritional factors found in plant foods. Antinutrients in plant foods are responsible for deleterious effects related to the absorption of nutrients and micronutrients. However, some antinutrients may exert beneficial health effects at low concentrations. For example, phytic acid, lectins, tannins, saponins, amylase inhibitors and protease inhibitors have been shown to reduce the availability of nutrients and cause growth inhibition. However, when used at low levels, phytate, lectins, tannins, amylase inhibitors and saponins have also been shown to reduce the blood glucose and insulin responses to starchy foods and/or the plasma cholesterol and triglycerides. In addition, phytates, tannins, saponins, protease inhibitors, goetrogens and oxalates have been related to reduce cancer risks. This implies that anti-nutrients might not always harmful even though lack of nutritive value. Despite of this, the balance between beneficial and hazardous effects of plant bioactives and anti-nutrients rely on their concentration, chemical structure, time of exposure and interaction with other dietary components. Due to this, they can be considered as anti-nutritional factors with negative effects or non-nutritive compounds with positive effects on health.
VL  - 3
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download