In an effort to improve upon tomato varieties on the Ghanaian market, this study was carried out to identify genotypes with desirable qualities for further breeding work. The study was executed by crossing some varieties of Solanum lycopersicon; cherry red, cherry yellow, roma and wosowoso with a wild tomato, Solanum pimpinellifolium. The progenies were cultivated for four generations to obtain these lines. Fruits harvested from these lines of F4 were analysed for the following physico-chemical properties; dry matter, pH, total titratable acidity, total soluble solids and vitamin C. The total soluble solids and total titratable acidity were used to deduce flavour and sweetness indices for the fruits. Significant (p<0.05) differences were observed among and within the various breeding lines. The dry matter, pH and total soluble solids of the fruits ranged from 5.21-8.43%, 4.08-4.59 and 4.00-7.80% respectively. Total titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, flavour and sweetness indices also ranged from 0.35-0.88%, 16.84-46.09 mg/100g, 0.07-0.16 and 5.33-13.64 respectively. In all wosowoso breeding lines were the most promising of all the breeding lines. Most of the progenies obtained had characteristics significantly (p<0.05) different from each other and then from those of their respective parents (controls). This shows that the various lines were still in the process of segregating and had not yet attained the status of pure lines.
Published in | International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Volume 3, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.23 |
Page(s) | 318-325 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Tomatoes, Breeding Lines, Physico-Chemical, Progenies
[1] | Tambo, J.A. and Gbemu, T. Resource-use Efficiency in Tomato Production in the Dangme West District, Ghana. Conference on International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development. Tropentag, ETH Zurich, Swzld. 2010. |
[2] | Stevens MA. Varietal influence on nutritional value. In PL White and N Selvey (eds.). Nutritional qualities of fresh fruits and vegetables. Futura Publ. Co., Mt. Kisco, N.Y., 1974; 87-110. |
[3] | Sablani SS, Opara LU, Al-Balushi K. Influence of bruising and storage temperature on vitamin C content of tomato fruit. J. Food Agric. Environ., 2006; 4(1):54-56. |
[4] | Stevens MA, Kader AA, Albright-Holton M, Algazi M. Genotypic variation for flavor and composition in fresh tomatoes. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 1977; 02:880-689. |
[5] | Stevens MA, Kader AA, Albright M. Potential for increasing tomato flavour via increased sugar and acid content. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1979; 102(6):724-731. |
[6] | Malundo TMM, Shewfelt RL, Scott JW. Flavor quality of fresh market tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as affected by sugar and acid levels. Post-harvest Biol. Technol., 1995; 6:103-110. |
[7] | Arazuri S, Jaren C, Arana JI, Perez De Ciriza JJ. Influence of mechanical harvest on the physical properties of processing tomato. J. Food Eng. 2007; 80:90-198. |
[8] | Artes F, Conesa MA, Hernandez S, Gill MI. Keeping quality of fresh-cut tomato. Post-harvest Biol. Technol., 1999; 17:153-162. |
[9] | DePascale S, Maggio A, Fogliano V, Ambrosino P, Retieni A. Irrigation with saline water improves carotenoids content and antioxidant activity of tomato. J. Horticl. Sci. Biotechnol., 2001; 76:447-453. |
[10] | Davies JN, Hobson LE. The constituents of tomato fruit, the influence of environment, nutrition and genotype. C.R.RC. Critical Rev. Food Sci. Nutrition. 1981; 15:205-80. |
[11] | Jongen W. Fruit and vegetables processing. Wood head publishing in Food Sci. and Technol. Wagenningen University, Netherlands, 2002; 350. |
[12] | Mizrahi Y, Taleisnik E, Kagan-Zur V, Zohas Y, Offenbach R, Matan R, Golan E. A saline irrigation regime for improving tomato fruit quality without reducing yield. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 1988; 113:202-205. |
[13] | Paulson KN, Stevens MA. Relationships among titratable acidity, pH and buffer composition of tomato fruits. J. Food Sci., 1974; 39:254-357. |
[14] | Georgelis N. High fruit sugar characterization, inheritance and linkage of molecular markers in tomato. A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Sci. University of Florida, 2002; 71. |
[15] | Saliba-Colombani V, Causse M, Langlois D, Philouze J, Buret M. Genetic analysis of organoleptic quality in fresh market tomato: Mapping QTLs physical and chemical traits. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2001; 102:259-272. |
[16] | Tigchelaar EC. Tomato breeding. In: Basset M.J. (ed.) Breeding vegetables crops. Westport, USA, AVI Publishing Co., Inc.: 1986; 135–170. |
[17] | Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). 15th Ed. Arlington, Va; 1990. |
[18] | Wardy W, Saalia FK, Steiner-Asiedu M, Budu AS, Sefa-Dedeh S. A comparison of some physical, chemical and sensory attributes of three pineapple (Ananas comosus) varieties grown in Ghana. African Journal of Food Science 2009; 3(1):022-025. |
[19] | Petro-Turza M. Flavour of tomato and tomato products. Food Rev. Int. 1987; 2(3):309-351. |
[20] | Turhan A, Sentz V. Estimation of certain chemical constituents of fruits of selected tomato genotypes grown in Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2009; 4(10):1086-1092. |
[21] | Salunkhe DK, Desai BB. Post-harvest biotechnology of vegetables. Vol. II. CRC Pres, Boca Raton, FL. 1984; 288. |
[22] | Rosales MA, Cervilla LM, Sánchez-Rodríguez E, Rubio-Wilhelmi M, Blasco B, Ríos JJ, Soriano T, Castilla N, Romero L, Ruiz JM. The effect of environmental conditions on nutritional quality of cherry tomato fruits: Evaluation of two experimental Mediterranean greenhouses. J. Sci Food Agric. 2011; 91:152–162. |
[23] | Cemeroglu B, Karadeniz F, Ozkan M. Meyvesebzeislemeteknolojisi. Gıda Teknolojisi Yayınları (in Turkısh), 2003; 28:469-472. |
[24] | Giordano LB, Silva JBC, Barbosa V. Escolha de cultivars e plantio. In: Silva JBC and Guarding LB (org) Tomatoe paraprocessamento industrial. Brasilia: Emrapa, CNPH, 2000; 36-59. |
[25] | Alcantar GG, Villarreal MR, Aguilar AS. Tomato growth and nutrient utilization in response to varying fertigation programs. Acta Hortic. 1999; 481:85-391. |
[26] | Sen F, Ugur A, Bozokalfa MK, Esiok D, Boztok K. Determination of yield, quality and storage properties of some greenhouse tomato cultivars (in Turkish). Aegean University Agric. Faculty J., 2004; 41(2):9-17. |
[27] | Kuzucu C, Kaynas K, Kuzucu F.C, Erken NT, Kaya S, Daydır HU. Bazı domates çeşitlerinin verim ve kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi (Determination of yield and quality characteristics of some tomato varieties). In: V. Sebze tarımı sempozyumu bildiri kitabı, 2004; 288-294. |
[28] | George B, Kaur C, Khurdiya DS, Kapoor HC Antioxidant in tomato as a function of genotype. Food Chem. 2004; 84:45-51. |
[29] | Okolie NP, Sanni TE. Effect of post-harvest treatments on quality of whole tomatoes. African Journal of Food Science 2012; 6:70-77. |
[30] | Gull DD, Locascio SJ, Kostewicz SR. Composition of greenhouse tomatoes as affected by cultivar, production media and fertilizer. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 1977; 90:395-397. |
APA Style
Wisdom Selorm Kofi Agbemavor, Wellington Torgby-Tetteh, Emmanuel Kwatei Quartey, Joseph Nunoo, Wonder Nunekpeku, et al. (2014). Physico-Chemical Evaluation of Fruits from the Fourth Filial Generation of Some Breeding Lines of Tomatoes. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 3(4), 318-325. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.23
ACS Style
Wisdom Selorm Kofi Agbemavor; Wellington Torgby-Tetteh; Emmanuel Kwatei Quartey; Joseph Nunoo; Wonder Nunekpeku, et al. Physico-Chemical Evaluation of Fruits from the Fourth Filial Generation of Some Breeding Lines of Tomatoes. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2014, 3(4), 318-325. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.23
AMA Style
Wisdom Selorm Kofi Agbemavor, Wellington Torgby-Tetteh, Emmanuel Kwatei Quartey, Joseph Nunoo, Wonder Nunekpeku, et al. Physico-Chemical Evaluation of Fruits from the Fourth Filial Generation of Some Breeding Lines of Tomatoes. Int J Nutr Food Sci. 2014;3(4):318-325. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.23
@article{10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.23, author = {Wisdom Selorm Kofi Agbemavor and Wellington Torgby-Tetteh and Emmanuel Kwatei Quartey and Joseph Nunoo and Wonder Nunekpeku and Mavis Owureku-Asare and Joyce Agyei-Amponsah and John Apatey}, title = {Physico-Chemical Evaluation of Fruits from the Fourth Filial Generation of Some Breeding Lines of Tomatoes}, journal = {International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences}, volume = {3}, number = {4}, pages = {318-325}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.23}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.23}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnfs.20140304.23}, abstract = {In an effort to improve upon tomato varieties on the Ghanaian market, this study was carried out to identify genotypes with desirable qualities for further breeding work. The study was executed by crossing some varieties of Solanum lycopersicon; cherry red, cherry yellow, roma and wosowoso with a wild tomato, Solanum pimpinellifolium. The progenies were cultivated for four generations to obtain these lines. Fruits harvested from these lines of F4 were analysed for the following physico-chemical properties; dry matter, pH, total titratable acidity, total soluble solids and vitamin C. The total soluble solids and total titratable acidity were used to deduce flavour and sweetness indices for the fruits. Significant (p<0.05) differences were observed among and within the various breeding lines. The dry matter, pH and total soluble solids of the fruits ranged from 5.21-8.43%, 4.08-4.59 and 4.00-7.80% respectively. Total titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, flavour and sweetness indices also ranged from 0.35-0.88%, 16.84-46.09 mg/100g, 0.07-0.16 and 5.33-13.64 respectively. In all wosowoso breeding lines were the most promising of all the breeding lines. Most of the progenies obtained had characteristics significantly (p<0.05) different from each other and then from those of their respective parents (controls). This shows that the various lines were still in the process of segregating and had not yet attained the status of pure lines.}, year = {2014} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Physico-Chemical Evaluation of Fruits from the Fourth Filial Generation of Some Breeding Lines of Tomatoes AU - Wisdom Selorm Kofi Agbemavor AU - Wellington Torgby-Tetteh AU - Emmanuel Kwatei Quartey AU - Joseph Nunoo AU - Wonder Nunekpeku AU - Mavis Owureku-Asare AU - Joyce Agyei-Amponsah AU - John Apatey Y1 - 2014/07/30 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.23 DO - 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.23 T2 - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences JF - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences JO - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences SP - 318 EP - 325 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2327-2716 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.23 AB - In an effort to improve upon tomato varieties on the Ghanaian market, this study was carried out to identify genotypes with desirable qualities for further breeding work. The study was executed by crossing some varieties of Solanum lycopersicon; cherry red, cherry yellow, roma and wosowoso with a wild tomato, Solanum pimpinellifolium. The progenies were cultivated for four generations to obtain these lines. Fruits harvested from these lines of F4 were analysed for the following physico-chemical properties; dry matter, pH, total titratable acidity, total soluble solids and vitamin C. The total soluble solids and total titratable acidity were used to deduce flavour and sweetness indices for the fruits. Significant (p<0.05) differences were observed among and within the various breeding lines. The dry matter, pH and total soluble solids of the fruits ranged from 5.21-8.43%, 4.08-4.59 and 4.00-7.80% respectively. Total titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, flavour and sweetness indices also ranged from 0.35-0.88%, 16.84-46.09 mg/100g, 0.07-0.16 and 5.33-13.64 respectively. In all wosowoso breeding lines were the most promising of all the breeding lines. Most of the progenies obtained had characteristics significantly (p<0.05) different from each other and then from those of their respective parents (controls). This shows that the various lines were still in the process of segregating and had not yet attained the status of pure lines. VL - 3 IS - 4 ER -